90000198 (2-disc set).
By John J. Puccio
Between the years 1797 and 1826 German composer and
pianist Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) wrote sixteen numbered string quartets
and one, single-movement, unnumbered quartet. The first six of these quartets
comprise Op. 18, which we have here in the Dover Quartet’s first volume of
complete Beethoven string quartets.
For those of you unsure of who The Dover Quartet are (or
for those who cannot remember the information I provided in a previous review
of their Mozart album, “Tribute”), they are, according to Wikipedia, “an
American string quartet. It was formed at the Curtis Institute of Music in 2008
by graduates of the Curtis Institute of Music and the Rice University Shepherd
School of Music. Its name is taken from the piece “Dover Beach” by Samuel
Barber. The quartet consists of violinists Joel Link and Bryan Lee, violist
Milena Pajaro-Van de Stadt, and cellist Camden Shaw. In 2020, the quartet was
appointed to the faculty of the Curtis Institute of Music as
ensemble-in-residence. Additionally, they hold residencies with the Kennedy
Center, Bienen School of Music at Northwestern University, Artosphere, the
Amelia Island Chamber Music Festival, and Peoples’ Symphony Concerts in New
York.” The current Beethoven album is the fourth one they have released on
which they are the primary performers.
So, here they give us Beethoven’s first six string
quartets, written between 1798-1800, starting with No. 1, which in
reality is the second quartet he wrote, but you know how those early numbering
systems went with publication dates and all. Anyway, the composer admitted that
he liked this second quartet better than the first ones he wrote (officially
numbered as Nos. 2 and 3) because he admitted “only now have I
learnt to write quartets.” OK, so No. 1 is the second one he wrote, and
apparently he felt he had finally gotten it right.
Whatever, the Dover Quartet play No. 1 with
elegance and élan. They do not attempt tempos quite so fast as most
historically informed groups might take, yet the music is always lively and
alert. The outer movements are joyous, and the slow movement is serene in a
melancholy way. They mesh well. As I’ve said before, the Dover Quartet play
with a passionate clarity, and while every instrument is distinctively
individual, they blend perfectly as a whole.
quartet he wrote, really is better than the first one he wrote. The fact is,
the first quartet he wrote seems to rest firmly on eighteenth-century norms. To
my ears No. 1 actually appears more original than either Nos. 2
or 3, even if the composer did borrow parts of No. 1 from an
earlier work of his. Anyway, Nos. 2 and 3 are light and frothy in
the classical manner, quite charming, actually, just not entirely substantive.
Or maybe I should say the Dover Quartet provide the substance.
With Nos. 4-6 (also published differently than
their chronological composition dates) Beethoven really came more into his own,
with No. 6 an especially strong entry with even more lyrical activity
and more gravitas than the previous ones, beginning with a delightful Mozartian
lilt. The last time I reviewed these Beethoven quartets was about a year or so
earlier, they were done by the Eybler Quartet on the CORO label, and they did
them a little differently. The Eybler Quartet are a period-instrument group and
adopt a slightly faster and more flexible tempo according to historical
practice. The Dover Quartet on modern instruments are marginally smoother and
more mellifluous than the Eyblers and a tad more romantic in style. I welcome
both perspectives and found them both a delight.
Producer Alan Bise and engineer Bruce Egre recorded the
quartets at Sauder Concert Hall, Goshen College Music Center, Goshen, Indiana
in 2018 and 2019. As with most Cedille recordings, this one is completely
natural and lifelike, meaning it is smooth, detailed, and realistically
presented. The acoustic of the hall provides a soft, ambient glow to the music
that complements it nicely. Never is the sonic picture hard, bright, or edgy.
Nor is it blurred, distant, spongy, or dull. It’s all quite pleasantly listenable.
If I have any minor concern at all, it would be about imaging. The group seems
rather widely spread out across the speakers, and there isn’t a lot of air,
distance, or depth among them. It’s a common practice in miking small string
ensembles, giving the impression of a single, larger group on a one-dimensional
plane. Nothing of consequence, though, really.
JJP
To listen to a brief excerpt from this album, click below:

